Flesch Reading Ease Calculator: Score Any Text Free
Paste any text to get its Flesch Reading Ease score, its Flesch-Kincaid grade level and an approximate reading age, with the long sentences pulled out so you know what to fix first. Both scores come from just two numbers: how many words you put in each sentence and how many syllables you put in each word. That is why shortening sentences almost always lifts your score faster than hunting for simpler synonyms.
Check your text
Paste a paragraph, a page of help copy or a whole article. Nothing leaves your browser.
Each line break counts as the end of a sentence, so headings and bullet points are scored as short sentences. Numbers count as one-syllable words.
How the Flesch scores are calculated
The Flesch Reading Ease formula, published by Rudolf Flesch in 1948, is 206.835 − 1.015 × (words ÷ sentences) − 84.6 × (syllables ÷ words). Higher is easier. Most everyday text lands between 0 and 100, though very short, simple sentences can push it above 100. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level, adapted for the US Navy in 1975, uses the same two inputs weighted differently: 0.39 × (words ÷ sentences) + 11.8 × (syllables ÷ words) − 15.59. It gives a US school grade, so the reading age shown here is that grade plus five to six years.
| Reading Ease score | Rating | Roughly suits |
|---|---|---|
| 90 to 100 | Very easy | Age 11 |
| 80 to 89 | Easy | Age 12 |
| 70 to 79 | Fairly easy | Age 13 |
| 60 to 69 | Plain English | Ages 13 to 15 |
| 50 to 59 | Fairly difficult | Ages 15 to 18 |
| 30 to 49 | Difficult | University students |
| 0 to 29 | Very difficult | University graduates |
Why the numbers can differ between checkers
Every readability tool has to guess where sentences end and how many syllables each word has, and none of them guess identically. This one counts vowel groups, drops most silent final e's and treats each line break as a sentence end, so bulleted lists and headings score as short sentences. Common abbreviations such as e.g., i.e. and etc. are not treated as full stops. Expect a score within a few points of Microsoft Word or Hemingway rather than an exact match, and compare drafts in the same tool. Reading time assumes 238 words per minute, the average silent reading rate for non-fiction that Marc Brysbaert found in a 2019 review of 190 studies.
Using readability in UX and conversion work
A score is a smoke alarm, not a style guide. It cannot tell whether your words are the ones your users actually use, or whether the page answers their question. Use it to catch the paragraph that has drifted into 40-word sentences, then check comprehension properly with real people: our usability testing guide covers how, and the usability test sample size calculator tells you how many sessions to run. If you rewrite a landing page for clarity, treat it as a hypothesis and measure it with the A/B test significance calculator rather than assuming simpler copy converts better.
More from Experimento
related resultsBest A/B Testing Tools in 2026, Compared by What They Actually Do
A practical 2026 comparison of the best A/B testing tools by what each one is actually good at, from Optimizely and VWO to GrowthBook and PostHog.
read result →A/B Testing Tools Compared: Which Platform Fits Your Team
A/B testing tools compared for 2026: VWO, Optimizely, AB Tasty, Convert, GrowthBook, Statsig and PostHog, matched to marketing, CRO and engineering teams.
read result →Data-Driven Design: Let Research Guide Your Product Decisions
A practical guide to data-driven design: how to pair analytics with user research, run honest tests, and make product decisions on evidence, not opinion.
read result →